
I hear how much this hurts, and I want to be straight with you. Hiring isn’t about whether someone is “good enough” — it’s about finding the best match for a very specific set of needs. Your dad might have been a strong candidate, but rejections usually happen for one or more of these reasons:
Here’s a quick look at what research shows about why candidates are rejected:
| Reason for Rejection | Percentage of Companies Reporting |
|---|---|
| Skills mismatch | 67% |
| Cultural fit | 55% |
| Salary expectations too high | 41% |
| Better qualified candidate | 38% |
| Missing application keywords | 29% |
(Source: aggregated from 2024–2025 surveys by SHRM and LinkedIn)
The key takeaway: it’s rarely personal. Your dad’s skills, experience, and personality might be excellent — but the hiring process is designed to filter, not to judge his worth. I’d encourage him to ask for feedback from the recruiter or hiring manager, and to tailor his resume and interview answers to each job’s specific requirements. Every “no” moves him closer to the right “yes.”

I’ve been on the hiring side for years, and I’ve had to turn down dozens of capable people. The hardest part is that we can only pick one person. Sometimes your dad was a finalist, but the other candidate had a specific certification or a portfolio that matched the role exactly. It’s not a reflection of his value. I’d suggest he connect with the hiring manager on LinkedIn and ask for a quick chat — many are open to giving honest feedback if approached respectfully.

Let me explain how the system works behind the scenes. Most companies use an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) that scans resumes for keywords from the job description. If your dad’s resume didn’t include terms like “project management,” “budget forecasting,” or “Python” (whatever the role required), it could have been automatically rejected. It’s a flaw, not a judgment. I recommend he tailors each resume to match the exact wording in the job ad. A simple tweak can make a huge difference.

I talk to job seekers every day, and I see a common pattern: rejection often comes down to storytelling, not skills. Your dad might have all the right experience, but if his cover letter, resume, and interview answers didn’t clearly show how he solved problems for previous employers, it’s easy for a recruiter to overlook him. Companies want to hire someone who can articulate their impact. I’d suggest he practices the “STAR” method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) for every key achievement. It makes a candidate unforgettable.

From the executive side, I can tell you that hiring decisions are often razor-thin. We review top candidates side by side, and the difference can be as small as who asked better questions during the interview or who showed more enthusiasm for the company’s mission. Your dad might have been a great fit, but the other candidate just clicked a little more with the team. I always encourage rejected candidates to keep applying and to treat each interview as a learning experience. If he reaches out politely for feedback


